Talk:Mount of piety/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Mount of piety. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Merge article
Everything of value here is now also represented at Monte di Pietà, pending final article title. This may be made a redirect eventually. --Wetman (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount of piety. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212200706/http://dictionary.oed.com/ to http://www.dictionary.oed.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212200706/http://dictionary.oed.com/ to http://www.dictionary.oed.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
"mount of piety"
This English name is it ever used? It is misleading. I suggest keep it as "Monte di Pietà" - which as the second paragraph of the lede says, is what they are called - with a bracket notation of the translation into English. --142.163.194.7 (talk) 13:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Use Italian
We should move to the Italian title rather than the awkward (home-made?) English translation. The Italian is normal in English - see the sources. Johnbod (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)