This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
Mount Edziza has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 15, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Edziza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011185251/http://www.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/exhibits/journeys/english/mountain_1_4a.html to http://www.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/exhibits/journeys/english/mountain_1_4a.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201130125/http://www.parkwardens.com/zone5/1.html to http://www.parkwardens.com/zone5/1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mount Edziza/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 13:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments to follow soon. ♦ JAGUAR 13:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Jaguar and Volcanoguy: what's going on?? this sat here for the whole of april. 750h+ 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry for the delay - life has been very hectic lately. Will finish this now. ♦ JAGUAR 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Lead
- "is a stratovolcano in Cassiar Land District of northwestern British Columbia" - is this not missing a definite article ('the')?
- "The third and fourth stages 0.9 million years ago" - 900,000 years ago?
- ""Thick trachyte flows were issued during the fifth stage 0.3 million years ago" - likewise, 300,000 years ago
- Body
- "A period of volcanic activity 0.3 million years ago deposited the Kakiddi Formation which also truncates the Ice Peak Formation." - same here, in the Stratigraphy subsection. Is there a technical reason why these are preferred?
- "Most of the Buckley Lake to Mowdade Lake Route is marked by a series of rock cairns from Tsekone Ridge onwards" - cairns has already been linked in the article
I've read through the entire article and am impressed by the usual standards. As a result I can find nothing holding this back, so will pass this outright. Apologies again for the delay. ♦ JAGUAR 16:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)