Talk:Moscow Armistice
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editMoscow intemediate peace treauty could be the precise name as it is in Finnish, Russiana and Swedish languages. The treauty determined both the borders and also the 300 000 000 dollar war reparations. Varsijousi (talk) 21:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Moscow Armistice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604120556/http://www2.hs.fi/english/archive/news.asp?id=20020903IE11 to http://www2.hs.fi/english/archive/news.asp?id=20020903IE11
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Sale of Jäniskoski-Niskakoski territory, not surrendered in the treaty?
edit[[1]] Claims that the area in question was sold in 1947 and not part of the 1944 treaty as outlined in the table. Can someone verify this and correct either article? BMlinhart (talk) 09:47, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- That article is correct. Table fixed. Betelgeuse X (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)