Talk:Mortal Kombat (2011 video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 04:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey Niemti, I'll be glad to take this review. As before, I'll start with an initial readthrough, listing any issues I can't easily fix, and then turn to the checklist. I know your nominations have been controversial lately, but I want to thank you as always for your many contributions. Looking forward to working with you again -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Initial readthrough

This looks very solid on a first pass: well written, well sourced, and comprehensive. I've made some minor tweaks for grammar and style as I went; feel free to revert anything you disagree with, and please double-check that I haven't inadvertently introduced any errors.

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is clear and correct; spotchecks show no evidence of copyright problems.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass