Talk:Moondance/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 12:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


I will review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Just a couple of minor things here:

  • Background: In the second paragraph, you speak of him making a third record. Isn't it his second?
Blowin' Your Mind! was his first, Astral Weeks his second. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Music and lyrics: sense of intense intimacy is not NPOV. It also sounds like a quote. If it is, give it as such.
I attributed that phrase to the author of the source, Brian Hinton. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Same goes for largely impenetrable.
Attributed. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Release and reception: End of second paragraph: Is LP in small letters in the source?
Yes, but it should be allowed under WP:MOS to capitalize them anyway. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • You should give sources for track listing and personnel. I guess that can be found on the album's booklet?
Done, @Zwerg Nase: Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

That's about it. I give the nominator(s) seven days to adress the issues. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Looks good, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply