Monturaqui has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 3, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Monturaqui appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Request
editBorrow the image from the German Wikipedia. Solarapex 03:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Monturaqui crater/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 18:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- " The crater was discovered in 1966." - this can be read as that it was first found then, when the body indicates that it was known as early as 1962. Recommend rephrasing this somehow to reflect that. Maybe "identified" instead of "discovered"?
- That's done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- " and further to Argentina runs 100–200 metres (330–660 ft) the crater" - you appear to be missing a word in here
- Recast this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- "The crater has been deemed one of the "most impressive" in the world" - recommend attributing the direct quote
- "In 2017, several Chilean organizations and the community of Peine petitioned the Chilean government to declare the site a historic monument. - This sentence contains what appears to be an incorrect link to a place in Germany
- Delinked. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- In the second paragraph of the impact event section, three straight sentences all start with "The impact ..."; recommend varying the phrasing a bit
- Make sure the indicate the language for all of the non-English sources
- That's done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have a script that detects harv and sfn errors installed, and it is flagging that you have defined a source named Buhler1988 in the reflist but that it is not used
- Image licensing looks fine and the sources seem to be reliable.
Good work, placing on hold. Hog Farm Talk 19:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Monturaqui crater (pictured) in Chile is threatened by human action? However, it does not count with any legal standing that may protect it, although there are a number of present and potential factors that threaten to damage it
Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 09:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC).
- Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, review follows; QPQ carried out; article promoted to GA on 3 July; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I can't access many of the sources but a spotcheck found no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and is cited to a reliable source; AGF that subscription-only source supports the hook; image is OK, maybe a bit wide, and freely licensed. Great article, just one note that you may want to covert one of the reference titles (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) from all caps to title case - Dumelow (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Did that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, review follows; QPQ carried out; article promoted to GA on 3 July; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I can't access many of the sources but a spotcheck found no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and is cited to a reliable source; AGF that subscription-only source supports the hook; image is OK, maybe a bit wide, and freely licensed. Great article, just one note that you may want to covert one of the reference titles (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) from all caps to title case - Dumelow (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)