Talk:Montenegro at the 2016 Summer Paralympics

Montenegro at the 2016 Summer Paralympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 9, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Olympics: Paralympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Paralympics task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Montenegro Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Montenegro at the 2016 Summer Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 18:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll take these on. Courcelles (talk) 18:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

"ninth out of all 13 " Don't mix number formats inside a sentence like this.
Need a source for Goranović's age.
"at a internationally" at an
" justify the exceptions" Exceptions? Any chance you mean expectations?

Otherwise this looks fine. Courcelles (talk) 21:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Courcelles: Have taken action on all of the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 09:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  - Promoted. Courcelles (talk) 15:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic