Talk:Monash University Faculty of Law

Untitled

edit

Any MonLaw Students out there with WikiSkills and a basic understanding of DD Law School please help out. Hope this gives us a start Domza 11:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I need help - Melbourne Law or Monash Law?

The facts: I am in Yr 12 this year and studying one Arts unit with Monash. Completing an extra year at Melbourne does not bother me (even though i would have to study Arts then Law. Whilst you can't get straight into Law at Melb, I won't be able to get the score to get straight into Arts/Law at Monash anyway --> ENTER for Arts is about the same at both (not an issue). Monash is colser and eaisier to get to. I like the thought of getting a JD, and am very interested in Arts, meaning theat Melb Arts is more appealing as it allows me to study more units, not including Breadth (I think). Monash has a better scholarship program, and even though I am unlikely to get one, with alot of hard work, I MAY be able to achieve the 95.00

Which has the better reputation, espicially for Law, but also for Arts?

Would somebody please help me - I am so confused! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.4.119 (talk) 13:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:Monash-shield.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blatant bias!!!

edit

"It is considered one of the best schools of law" - How very neutral. This article needs a massive cleanup because it contains so many biased statements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.132.25 (talk) 06:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Monash University Faculty of Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Controversial statements made by Luke Beck from law school

edit

Luke Beck has argued as seen in this ABC article that pastors and so forth should not receive JobKeeper because it is “unconstitutional”. This clowns comments were rejected by Josh Frydenberg. This should be included because it’s a notable position taken by Monash faculty https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-05/churches-religious-entities-got-millions-in-jobkeeper-payments/100349412 120.29.40.104 (talk) 01:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply