Talk:Mokha

File:Mokha port 1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mokha port 1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

terminology used change request

subject: "Turkish domination" terminology in this article is wrong

Dear Sir,

I have noticed some errors in the article. In the article "Turkish domination" is used but it is wrong. The term "domination" is vague. and the term turkish is also vague in term of which cultural and ethnic community that it is pointing out. The pasha term in the time of ottoman empire was meaning commander of the army. It should be replaced by "sultan" which meaning is same as "king" or "emperor". The whole term "Turkish domination" should be replaced with "Ottoman Empire". Ottoman empire is not a "turkish" empire. In the ottoman empire population were not calling themselves as "turks". "Turk" became after 1923 a term defining a cultural community but it was still not defining an ethnic group. (source: Bozkurt Govenc "Turk kimligi - Kultur tarihinin kaymaklari " Edition "Boyut Yayinclik" 2010)(original edition: Türk Kimliği (Remzi 1992, Boyut 2008)

About Bozkurt Guvenc Bozkurt guvenc was a professor at Hacettepe University and his area of work was culture, Cultural changes and education - for more details:

Thank you Oruckenan (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2012 (UTC) Oruc Yildirim oruc@outsideuniverse.comOruckenan (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

References

"Village was officially relocated" ...

The sentence " The village of Mocha was officially relocated 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) west along the Red Sea shore to accommodate the building and demolition of several coastal highways." is vague, a coastal road goes along the coast, so how can several do this? And the fact that it talks of both building and destruction of these roads is confusing. It also sounds like an infrastructure planning disaster and the destruction of a historical site, more information is needed! 212.64.14.89 (talk) 20:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mocha, Yemen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726043107/http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=901&p=business&a=1 to http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=901&p=business&a=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 1 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 14:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Mocha, Yemen → Mokha – The alternative name "Mokha" is both a better transliteration, the خ in Arabic script is Romanized by default as 'kh', and well sourced, and so is a viable form of natural disambiguation. In a control group of scholarly hits from 2022, Mokha had 29 hits to 39 hits for Mocha (I filtered out the term "coffee" from the search to avoid references to the beverage or beans) - so the usage is fairly comparable, but while Mocha requires disambiguation, Mokha, which already redirects here, actively disambiguates. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
• Support--Lubiesque (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Other articles

@Graham87 There is already a disambiguition page already linked in the article; these other articles should be added there Abo Yemen✉ 10:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

@Abo Yemen: That disambiguation page is for Mocha, not Mokha. Also, please do not use condescending automated edit summaries when dealing with experienced editors (i.e. don't template the regulars). Graham87 (talk) 10:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

We can make a disambiguation page for mokha instead of linking many articles here + sorry for templating you Abo Yemen✉ 08:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

There are only two other articles that would be appropriate for disambiguation, which isn't really enough. I've compacted the footnote. Apology accepted re the edit summary. Graham87 (talk) 14:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)