Talk:Mission, Calgary

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Hwy43 in topic Merge proposal with Rouleauville
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mission, Calgary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal with Rouleauville

edit

I support the merge proposal made by Thivierr, the articles are clearly about the same location. signed, Rosguill talk 06:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Support the merge - same place, and the Mission article may benefit from some of the historical background in Rouleauville. PKT(alk) 14:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: Perhaps I was mistaken. It seems en:Rouleauville is just a copy/paste machine translation of fr:Rouleauville, losing wiki formatting in the process, making the content worthless, since a person doing the merge should go directly to fr:Rouleauville. Also, there's a problem that French Wikipedia has both fr:Rouleauville and fr:Mission, Calgary (like we do). So, it's not clear what a merged article should link to in "fr".   Hopefully there's a bilingual person that can sort this stuff out. --Rob (talk) 15:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: as most might see from this article, Rouleauville was formerly its own municipality. I recently mapped the former boundaries of Rouleauville when preparing a historical annexation map of Calgary. I haven’t overlaid the community boundary for Mission to see if the two are coincident or not. If they vary, that might be reason enough to have separate articles. However, given that I saw so much unsourced content and the above observation about it being a translation from French Wikipedia, I support its recent move to draft space. Hwy43 (talk) 01:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply