Talk:Miracle Foundation

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Neutrality of article

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've made some significant edits to the article to remove some of the worst offending content in violation of NPOV, however there's likely still significant issues with the neutrality of the article. I'm therefore creating this talk section as a place to discuss and amend any further issues, so that this article can be brought in line with encyclopedic policies.

Furthermore, it appears that this page has been the subject of multiple self-promotional edits by accounts linked to the Miracle Foundation itself, including: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. I'd thus recommend that any editors take no hesitation in reverting edits from these accounts if deemed necessary, as they seem purely interested in self-promotion. While this article was clearly initially created as self-promotion,[6] it does meet notability requirements, and thus should be re-written and brought to encyclopedic standards, not deleted. Builder018 (talk) 17:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic