Talk:Minnesota Starvation Experiment

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reassessment

edit

I think this article is well past stub-class by now, but more work is always welcome; this is an interesting footnote in US WWII home-front history. Wi2g 22:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Conflict in number of initial volunteers in two places in this article: 200 vs. 400

edit

In the intro:

The study was developed in coordination with the Civilian Public Service (CPS) and the Selective Service System and utilized 36 men selected from a pool of over 200 CPS volunteers.[1]:46

In the Participant volunteers section (completely unreferenced):

In early 1944, a recruitment brochure was drafted and distributed within the network of CPS work camps throughout the United States. Over 400 men volunteered to participate in the study as an alternative to military service; of these, about 100 were selected for detailed examination... 36 men were ultimately selected...

Sorry all I can do is point this out. Thanks in advance to the person who can research & edit this. --Geekdiva (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minnesota Starvation Experiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply