Talk:Mind.in.a.box

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sergecross73 in topic Concerns over notability
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mind.in.a.box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mind.in.a.box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Concerns over notability

edit

I have substantial concerns over whether this band has ever even received enough coverage in reliable news sources to be considered notable enough to have an article. I just redirected about five of their album articles, as most of them had been unsourced for over half a decade. @Sergecross73: What do you think? Over half of the 12 sources cited on this article are primary (either the band's website, their label's or their Facebook), and the rest appear to be no-name blogs (Brutal Resonance, I Die You Die, Movement Magazine and Side-Line Magazine) covering independent rock or electronic music. Ss112 00:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I did a preliminary search, and didn’t see anything reliable in the article or in a Google search. The only exception is Allmusic, and it’s a bit of a peculiar case - they have no AM Bio, but they do have 3 staff written album reviews. Not sure I’ve ever come across that before. You could send it to AFD, and I bet it’d have a good shot at deletion I think hardline policy experts would go delete, but more casual edits may say the AM stuff is enough. It’s also possible someone digs up sources native to Austria as well, that tends to happen in foreign video game AFDs on occasion. Sergecross73 msg me 00:22, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply