This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Probably needs discussion of how Hijratwala has been publicly accused of fraud and attempting to capitalize on this issue to promote her pathetic writings. Really, try reading her stuff and ... well, if it weren't for identity politics, this fraud would be sweeping streets. Her career is based solely on being the 'voice' of 'oppressed' high caste Indian princesses and McMaster exposed her pathetic self. Hence she is pursuing a vendetta here (WhisperToMe is her) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joatsimeon (talk • contribs) 00:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Who accused her of fraud? Why? What sources?
We already know that MacMaster accused her of infringing copyright by hosting the passages sent to her, and that she refused to take the passage down and asked people to circulate the passages. Also MacMaster emailed the NYT and asked for information regarding filing a libel suit against the author.
Other than MacMaster's accusations, I am not aware of any others.
And no, I'm not the author. I didn't just join here (I've been an editor since 2003) - that's a silly accusation, and I am going to ask you to stop personally attacking me. Thank you,
WhisperToMe is not Minal Hajratwala, having more than 100,000 edits on a wide variety of topics. There is evidence that Joatsimeon is Tom MacMaster, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joatsimeon. I am no sockpuppet, myself, having been here for several years though I only have a hundred-odd edits; personally, I do not find Hijratwala's writings pathetic, and nor does the reviewer cited of her published book. Abigailgem (talk) 12:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
However, I do not think the Tom MacMaster stuff is relevant to this article. Minal Hajratwala is a published author of some repute. Her involvement in the Amina hoax is relevant to the article on the hoax, but the hoax itself is so pathetic and unimportant that it should not be awarded undue weight here. Abigailgem (talk) 12:52, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}