edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/news121965.html
    Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/newsrosobornexport-mi-171e-china
    Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

troops capacity

edit

it is posible to add troops/civilians capacity for versions ? it will be greatly helpfull. 2A00:1028:9198:E50E:24D9:CE98:B471:EFBD (talk) 21:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Mil Mi-17

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Mil Mi-17's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "World Air Forces 2019":

  • From List of Mil Mi-8/17 operators: "World Air Forces 2019". Flightglobal Insight. 2019. Retrieved 3 April 2019.
  • From NHIndustries NH90: "World Air Forces 2019". Flightglobal Insight. 2019. Archived from the original on 23 January 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2019.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 21:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Should the Main MI17 Picture of the article be changed?

edit

since the present main pic on the article is of a historical Afghan airforce i think it be replaced by this one

 
Pakistan_Army_Mil_Mi-17_Asuspine-1

PHANTOM 2004 (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is not an article covering current users and use of the helicopter, so there is no issue with retaining the Afghan photo in the infobox, even if the colour scheme of the Afghan air force has since changed following the taliban takeover.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply