 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gazprom Media Activities
editInteresting relationship graph: http://www.forbes.ru/sites/default/files/users/user149255/Screen_Shot_2014-09-19_at_15.09.33.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.241.108 (talk) 07:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Religion
editWhat was his religion? --2003:8B:8F61:F28:94B8:5FB6:A414:D533 (talk) 03:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Over-reference
editI count 20 references in the Death section concerning the simple announcement yesterday that he died of blunt force trauma. There will be much more on this story in the future. A few better sources is better than lots of sources. -- GreenC 03:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Since I posted the above yesterday, we are now up to 33 different references. Most of these should be deleted, there is no need to present a wall of references. This is not an archive of every source in every language that mentions Mikhail Lesin's death. -- GreenC 02:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
See also link to Michael R. Caputo
editShould Vladimir Gusinsky and Mikhail Lesin contain a "See also" link to Michael R. Caputo? It was added by IP, removed by me, and re-added by IP. Now we discuss.
To me it looks like WP:OR (Original Research) trying to highlight a connection between these individuals. See also can be misused giving too much WP:WEIGHT for some other agenda. If there was a reason to link to them, why isn't it discussed in the main text with sources? Where are the sources that shows a substantial link between these three? -- GreenC 14:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Garbage
editThe article contains a lot of garbage added by a Long Term Abuse account User talk:67.53.214.86. Nothing they did should be assumed to be accurate reflection of the sources, or relevant to the article. It goes back to 2017. -- GreenC 17:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Removed some, but still a lot of source-stuffing with a single fact having 6-12 sources, much of it in Russian, which English readers will have trouble accessing; it's unclear why we need Russian sources when an English source is verifiable. -- GreenC 18:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)