Talk:Mike Park

npov

This article reads as if written by a fanboy, or perhaps Mike Park himself. It's overly personal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.114.60.187 (talk) 05:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

'successfully run out of his garage in California since 1996 with only minimal help' is the only misleading statement i can find in this article. sucessfully is a vague term, where as sucess is rather subjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.206.47.126 (talk) 18:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

This is silly why is this still in dispute? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.228.32 (talk) 09:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not seeing any real criticism, and nobody seems to agree. Aaand that was over two years ago. Huh? --Zuwiki // talk 00:07, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

There are many news articles about the success of the label and being run out of his garage. for example http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/01.15.98/records1-9802.html Bestbeast (talk) 01:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ForTheLoveOfMusic.gif

Image:ForTheLoveOfMusic.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Plea for Peace Foundation

Plea for Peace Foundation is too short and doesn't have enough references to reliable sources. Unforgettableid (talk) 05:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726234827/http://koreanpop.org/?p=23 to http://koreanpop.org/?p=23

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 26 December 2017 (UTC)