Talk:Middleborough/Lakeville station

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Pi.1415926535 in topic GA Review

Parking lot size

edit

Absolutely none of the available sources agree about the history of the parking lot size.

I've updated the article as best as I can with what isn't in dispute. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Middleborough/Lakeville station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 06:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments

edit

@Pi.1415926535: I have completed the review. Please check.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  18:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@ArnabSaha: Thanks for the review! I've replied to your comments above. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply