Talk:Michael W. Smith discography
![]() | Michael W. Smith discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael W. Smith discography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where Are the 80s Singles?
editMWS had a lot of singles released in the 80s, not for mainstream, but to the Contemporary Christian stations. Songs like "Friends" "I Know" et cetera, which were tracked by CCM Magazine. Why are they not included in the list? ---- 72.70.157.161 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:21, 4 June 2010 (UTC).
Would there be any objections if we separate the Christmas and Instrumental albums?
editI feel like they're different from regular studio albums. Thoughts?--Krystaleen 06:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- It breaks the chronological flow, but I could see some readers specifically looking for those albums. Others? Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- I see what you mean, but the chronological flow has already been broken anyway because the live albums are listed separately. I know it's in the wikipedia guide to list live albums separately but as we all know, his live albums aren't just some live versions of his existing studio albums, but more like actual albums with new material, only live. So to me at least, the chronological flow is already broken. I know as a new fan a few years ago I found the list a bit confusing because of the instrumental and Christmas albums thrown together with regular albums. But I wouldn't mind waiting for another editor's opinion.--Krystaleen 16:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Excellent point. Since it's a fairly large body of work it makes sense to separate it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah it's pretty large indeed, which is why it was overwhelming to me. Anyway if no one objects in about a week I'd separate them then, unless someone else did it first. Thanks.--Krystaleen 16:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- This is now done. I have another suggestion though.--Krystaleen 10:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Excellent point. Since it's a fairly large body of work it makes sense to separate it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- I see what you mean, but the chronological flow has already been broken anyway because the live albums are listed separately. I know it's in the wikipedia guide to list live albums separately but as we all know, his live albums aren't just some live versions of his existing studio albums, but more like actual albums with new material, only live. So to me at least, the chronological flow is already broken. I know as a new fan a few years ago I found the list a bit confusing because of the instrumental and Christmas albums thrown together with regular albums. But I wouldn't mind waiting for another editor's opinion.--Krystaleen 16:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Should we just combine all the studio albums in one table?
editNow that it's not as crowded as it used to, I think they don't need to be separated by decades anymore. It'll be tidier as well.--Krystaleen 10:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Fourteen may be too many, but try it out in a sandbox page to see if you think it looks good or not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Okay I'll use my sandbox. Will let you know what I think later.--Krystaleen 18:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- So I've tried it in my sandbox User:Krystaleen/sandbox#Studio albums. Looks ok I think. Fewer tables to deal with too.--Krystaleen 10:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. BTW, you can create multiple pages in your user space. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, I've merged it now. Thanks for the info I didn't know that.--Krystaleen 15:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. BTW, you can create multiple pages in your user space. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editExtended content
|
---|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to one external link on Michael W. Smith discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know. An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Michael W. Smith discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110819122754/http://knet180radio.com/02_news_article.asp?iNewsId=-1765049049 to http://knet180radio.com/02_news_article.asp?iNewsId=-1765049049
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160408080140/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsSX9830r3Q to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsSX9830r3Q
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- The knet180radio.com link does not appear to be in the archive. It was crawled 11 times, but a sampling of them shows that nothing was saved.
- The YouTube video is not in the archive at all. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editExtended content
|
---|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Michael W. Smith discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC) |
External links modified (January 2018)
editExtended content
|
---|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Michael W. Smith discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC) |
Limiting entries in the guest appearances and collaborative albums section
editI removed a large number of single songs from the guest appearances and collaborative albums section. When the Smith has worked on hundreds of albums, making a comprehensive table like this is difficult. Please remember, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Usually, when a list is short, we don't pay attention to lists like this. When the list starts to grow, we start deleting entries for subjects that don't have articles (removing non-notable entries). If it is still too large, we will often remove all entries that didn't chart. I started with that principle. Other editors might have started by removing entries that don't have references. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:43, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- I understand. However, if the problem is that the list is too long, wouldn't removing the "songs written for other artists" section make more sense than removing these?--Krystaleen 14:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- My concern is not that the discography is too long, it is that individual sections are becoming too large. I agree that songs written for other artists could be trimmed as well. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Rework
editI've just completely revamped this article, fixing the tables to meet standards, fixing the sources to be comprehensive and accurate (singles were formerly united), and removing sections that are typically excluded (like writing credits, music videos, and maxi singles). I think the lede could use some touching up, though, if anyone is up to it - Smith's career is so long that it is hard to summarize in just a few paragraphs Toa Nidhiki05 03:11, 8 July 2019 (UTC)