Talk:Michael Spindler

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Apple Inc. High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Today

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

What's with Spindler nowadays? Is he alive? If so, what is he doing? Is his health OK? Demf 19:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

When he was at Apple, he got easily stressed; he was never suited for the job of a CEO. I guess he's still alive, I don't think he ever liked much publicity. — Wackymacs 19:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

So apparently he passed away (looks confirmed by Jean-Louis Gassée): https://www.macg.co/aapl/2018/04/michael-spindler-ceo-dapple-de-1993-1996-est-mort-102113

wow..from the article: "Spindler died of illness in 2017." yes, "Illness" kills quite a few people every year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.66.96.255 (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Newton a failed project?

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the newton technology ecosystem never achieved it's potential but calling it failed project, at least during spindler's time strikes me as a stretch. newton got off to a very rocky start (mostly due to poor marketing that over-emphasized the immature handwriting recognition feature) and took a couple of iterations to mature. the platform became quite good and was poised to take off when the plug was pulled, apparently for reasons that had more to do with personalities and politics than the technical merits or market potential of the product line. please recall that despite much better initial marketing the macintosh got off to pretty rough start as well. it took foresight and perseverance to see the mac through the three or four product generations it took to become viable. i think the foresight and perseverance of spindler and amelio to nurture newton, sculley's ugly ducking through to swan status was also admirable. i'm not sure how to characterize it as "successful" may not be a great fit, but neither is "failed". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.196.235 (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic