Talk:Michael Hunter (historian)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by GrindtXX in topic Recent edits
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Hunter (historian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits

edit

An IP has repeatedly tried to remove, largely without explanation, Hunter's postnominals (FBA and FRHistS), and a mention of his enthusiasm for motorcycling. I have repeatedly tried to restore them. The motorcycling is trivial, but it is sourced information and I see no harm in including it. The postnominals are marks of notable academic standing, and should certainly be included: FBA in particular is awarded only to leading academics in the humanities and social sciences; FRHistSoc is a little less elite, but still a noteworthy distinction. Both are normally included as a matter of course in Wikipedia articles and elsewhere. In the one edit in which the IP did provide an explanation, it ran "Motorcycle enthusiasm irrelevant to professional associations that justify presence on Wikipedia. Titles irrelevant to professional historical contributions. Previous edits suggest self-promotion.", which as far as I'm concerned is incomprehensible nonsense. This has now reached the stage where the IP's actions amount to vandalism, and I am reverting to the status quo and seeking temporary page protection. GrindtXX (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply