Talk:Michael Andrew (swimmer)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 25 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Michael Andrew. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Neutrality concerns in the “Personal” section
editWhile I wouldn’t consider the statements necessarily false, the tone of the “Personal” section appears to be somewhat aggrandizing by inserting interspersed comments about the intentions of Mr. Andrew. My belief is that the article would be more neutral if a separate section or expose was dedicated to his faith and worldview; the upfront delineation could add credibility to the article. JC Berger (talk) 13:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- I agree, the tone and style of this section was inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I've tried cleaning up some of this language. -Eóin (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 25 July 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 12:23, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
– clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views [1] Joeykai (talk) 22:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Is that just WP:RECENTISM? — BarrelProof (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Long-term page views show the musician getting more hits. BD2412 T 20:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. No clear primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose DAB should be at base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty much agree with everything said above. Not clear what benefit it would bring, unless confusion is a benefit. | MK17b | (talk) 04:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with everything said above.I add a viewpoint of a non native English speaker,this name seems to be pretty common,thus confusing.Paperworkorange (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)