Mervyn Ingram has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 18, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mervyn Ingram article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mervyn Ingram/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 02:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Initial comment
editI am starting the review. I've skimmed the article and it looks like it will need few, if any, corrections. Djmaschek (talk) 02:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Review 1
editFor GA reviews, I prefer that the nominator make all edit changes. If you disagree with my recommended edits, please argue your case. I make mistakes too. Djmaschek (talk) 03:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Early life: "he worked as a clerk for Shell Oil." - Add a link to Shell Oil, assuming it is the same as Shell Oil Company.
- Done. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Channel front: "including one search and rescue operation, with the squadron before being posted" - I would put the comma after "squadron".
- I disagree on this one; I think grammatically it is correct since I'm clarifying the nature of one of the sorties flown. That said, TBH I think that the clarification doesn't add much so have opted to remove the mention of the search and rescue operation to render the issue moot. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Channel front: The introduction says No. 486 Squadron formed in March 1942. The date it was formed also needs to be mentioned here.
- Done. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Service with No. 601 Squadron, paragraph 1: "embarking on 14 April" > "embarking on 14 April 1942". - I don't like to be scrolling up and down to figure out the year. Other readers may have the same problem.
- Done. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Service with No. 601 Squadron, paragraph 5: "Posted to No. 244 Wing Base Training Pool" - What did he do here? The sentence makes it seem as though he only instructed pilots at No. 1 Middle East Training School.
- The source doesn't explicitly say; I think it may have been possible that it was a "holding pen" for pilots to wait for a posting but that would be OR. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Service with No. 601 Squadron, paragraph 5: "He only had a brief stay with the unit for after flying on 14 sorties" > "only 14 sorties" - IMO, "only" works better here.
- Done. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Service with No. 601 Squadron, paragraph 5: "also based in Malta, the next month" - What month? If it was July, please specify.
- Have specified it was July. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Squadron commander, paragraph 1: "On 10 August" > "On 10 August 1943". - Put year at top of section.
- Done. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Squadron commander, paragraph 2: "Ingram died on 11 July." > "Ingram died on 11 July 1944." - Year again.
- Done. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- We overuse the word "hero" these days, but this fellow was a real hero.
- Agreed. It amazes me that he was a squadron leader, in charge of a bunch of fighter pilots, at the age of just 22 (and he won't have been the only one). I was really wet behind the ears when I was that age. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
GA Criteria.
- Well-written. See above notes.
- Verifiable. Done
- Broad in its coverage. Done
- Neutral. Done
- Stable. Done
- Illustrated. Done
@Djmaschek: Thanks for the review, it is greatly appreciated. I have responded above with comments and my edits to the article are here. Thanks again. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Good work. I will promote it to GA class presently. Djmaschek (talk) 03:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)