This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
What do the following mean?
"The river is fed by streams and therefore..." — don't most rivers have tributaries? How does this make this river "cool in summer" and minimize fluctuations of the water level?
"At the end of the 19th century the watershed area of Merkys grew by some 410 km² as its tributary Ūla River overtook some of Kotra River watershed area." — What does "overtook" mean? Rivers aren't sentinent beings acting autonomously, so why did these drainage bassins change? Engineering?
Ok, first thing is easy and it should be "underground streams." The second is more complicated. It was a natural process. Ūla and Kotra form one river at first, but then at some point that one river breaks into two rivers flowing into two different directions (anti-confluence :]). Sometime in the 19th century Ūla started getting far more water from that one common river and its drainage area grew. Don't know the details, maybe will try to dig out later. Renata10:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Allright. Trying to live up to my reputation as a "prolific digger" :-), some more things to consider: The article also mentions an average discharge of Merkys of 3 m³/s (above the canal). How does this fit with [1] (35.3 m³/s at Puvociai) or [2] (31.8 m³/s)? lt:Merkys gives 33.4 m³/s, without source. The first of these links also mentions that the Merkys was a clean river; compare also with [3]. And then there's also a groundwater report on Lithuania [4], but I'm having trouble downloading it. Lupo11:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
