This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles
A fact from Meinhard von Gerkan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough and long enough, it is generally well-sourced and is plagiarism free. A QPQ is done. Image is clear, and free to use. The hook is cited and is interesting, and is sourced, although the signandsite web page is a copy of text from Süddeutsche Zeitung on 29 November, 2006 - so perhaps i could/should be replaced with the original source? For the timebeing the Guardian article is still a good source. It's really interesting, thanks for the effort! Lajmmoore (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
good point, Lajmmoore. i had noticed that too, but had been unable to find the same text on süddeutsche zeitung's site, so i had figured that, if it was available online, it was probably only available in german. to conform with wp:rsue, i had figured that using the signandsight source may be preferred over using the original article if it was in german. following your comment, i tried looking a little harder, and eventually realized that a search of the site for some of the relevant proper names (which would appear the same in either an english or a german article) might turn up something. this google search returned one hit for an article from 2010, which doesn't cover quite the same material.personally, i think the signandsight source is more appropriate than the 2010 article in this instance, though please let me know if you think otherwise, or have found any other articles that may serve as a better source. in any case, my more recent search efforts turned up additional articles that i may end up working into the article on von gerkan, so thanks for the suggestion! dying (talk) 06:29, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Article is new enough and long enough, it is generally well-sourced and is plagiarism free. A QPQ is done. Image is clear, and free to use. The hook is cited and is interesting, and is sourced, although the signandsite web page is a copy of text from Süddeutsche Zeitung on 29 November, 2006 - so perhaps i could/should be replaced with the original source? For the timebeing the Guardian article is still a good source. It's really interesting, thanks for the effort! Lajmmoore (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)