Talk:Maurice's Balkan campaigns
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Balkanfeldzüge des Maurikios from de.wikipedia. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Hang on
editHang on, people.
I will post a complete translation of my German article de:Balkanfeldzüge des Maurikios. The best is yet to come, thus removing stub-status. Hungerhahn 14:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Here it is, finally.
editHave fun.Hungerhahn (talk) 12:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Suggestions
editI have some suggestions and problems that caught my eye when I started reading. There seems to be a space between a period and a ref, also I believe that the first two sections need more references. I suggest formatting the refs into two columns using {{ref|2}}. I also think the lead should be significantly expanded. That should get you started and I wish you the best of luck.--The Dominator (talk) 06:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I will get going as soon as I have enough time.Tagmatarchos (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Also, another thing about the lead (see WP:LEAD) the first sentence should summarize the article title, so it should sound something like "Maurice's Balkan Campaigns were a series of military expeditions conducted by emperor Maurice in an attempt to defend the Balkan from Avars and Slavs." A lead should also summarize the entire article, not just introduce the topic and should refrain from giving new information to the reader. The Dominator (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Effectiveness
editi note that this article uses much info from Curta's great book. So how, then, have we missed his opinion that Maurice's campaigns were less than effective (the contrary to what is presented in this artile). He suggests that his campaigns were for show, and it did not stop (not did it 'intend to stop) Slavs freely roaming Imperial land. Yet the concluding few paragraphs state that Murice's "stern" defense of the Balkans had somehow pacified the Sclavenes. Hxseek (talk) 02:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
1. The article uses information from various sources, basically facts rather than opinions. If the Slavs roamed freely in Imperial land during Maurice's campaigns, coin hoards or signs of destruction would have clearly marked this. Curta, however speaks of reconstruction during Maurice's and possibly even Phocas' regnal years.
2.One paragraph reads: Although it is widely believed that his campaigns were only a token measure[1] and that Roman rule over the Balkans collapsed immediately after his overthrow in 602[2]. It is not Curta's sole opinion and it is not missed in the article.
3. The concluding few paragraphs do not state pacification of the Slavs. Rathermore, they state that the Avars were no longer perceived as invincible and that the Slavs threw off the Avar yoke. Tagmatarchos (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maurice's Balkan campaigns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071112144124/http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/sources/theophylact.htm to http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/sources/theophylact.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)