Talk:Mathias Gnädinger
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edits and claimed "rv" on 8 April 2015 by[ [user:Rms125a@hotmail.com]]
editIn short, what about those edits on April 8, 2015? Imho hardly rv serious OR or dd/mm/yyyy format consistency as claimed, hence imho unpolite. and thus in short imho hardly to define as good faith... arguments, user:Rms125a@hotmail.com? Roland zh (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Your opinion is flawed, sadly, I stand by the edits and I believe the edit summaries ("rv serious OR", "dd/mm/yyyy format consistency", etc) are accurate. My edit summaries are not always as detailed and sometimes I just put "ce" (for "copyedit"). An objective editor viewing the diffs should have no problems with the editing in question, although I am not perfect and can always make mistakes, like everyone else. Quis separabit? 16:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mathias Gnädinger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20150408014126/http://tellfilm.ch/filmographie/projekte/123_sumotori6 to http://tellfilm.ch/filmographie/projekte/123_sumotori6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)