Talk:Matagorda Bay
 | Matagorda Bay has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Matagorda Bay is part of the Major estuaries of Texas series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 21, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Matagorda Bay in Texas was separated from East Matagorda Bay after local residents diverted the Colorado River to control flooding? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Matagorda Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 22:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am beginning a review of this article. Initially, I found that the reference http://www.gulfbase.org/bay/view.php?bid=matagorda (ref 10) seems unaccessible. This is ok now. Xtzou (Talk) 12:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Also, there are several links that need disambiguation. http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py?page=Matagorda_Bay
- There appear to be many common words that are linked, constituting overlinking.
- Lead
- "system's northwestern extension of Lavaca Bay" - Is Matagorda Bay considered a system?
- "Port O'Connor is located on the southwestern tip of the main bay's shore." - what is meant by the "main bay"? Are there other bays, of which Matagorda Bay is considered the main?
Xtzou (Talk) 22:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- The nominator and I have each done some editing. I feel any reservations I had about the GA status of the article have been satisfied. Xtzou (Talk) 17:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Clearly and concisely written
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MoS
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 17:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Matagorda Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100924062441/http://gulfbase.org/bay/view.php?bid=matagorda to http://www.gulfbase.org/bay/view.php?bid=matagorda
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)