Talk:Mass media in Russia

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Mikehawk10 in topic Kommersant has an RFC

How is RT not mentioned?

edit

RT, the Russians state most prominent international mouthpiece, is not mentioned here at all Ottawakismet (talk) 18:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

self-censorship

edit

Here's something interesting about self-censorship in Russia - could be useful.Malick78 (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Can anyone explain this? Is it because I am inexperienced? But I can see 13 separate occasions where references seem to have been made, apparently to books or articles by "Oates" and "Treisman", without any URL or ISBN number or any other information. Surely these are not acceptable references!PussBroad (talk) 14:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

@PussBroad: The ISBN numbers and other book details are at Media of Russia#Literature. In order to avoid repetition, the reference section only gives page numbers. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Media of Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Media of Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Media of Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A more "Western" media approach ... sources outside the official Kremlin stance.

edit

https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/how-the-kremlin-and-the-media-ended-up-in-bed-together-44663

That is much too tongue-in-cheek and self-reporting of the media itself to be taken seriously.

The idea of "an official Kremlin stance" has been outdated for decades. That depends on the political stance of the president currently in office. Many Russian government officials are widely quoted in the media expressing opinions differing markedly from those of Vladimir Putin on any particular issue of the day.

"Western" is a little bit of a code word in the Russian media for "liberal" or "leftist" (looking at the left side of the map); an outdated holdover from Western opposition to hardline communism during the Cold War.

The Russian press is rather outdated and overly "established," much the same as "Western" mainstream media, and the hidden political assumptions and pretexts are likewise outdated. 24.237.158.24 (talk) 04:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kommersant has an RFC

edit
 

Kommersant has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply