Talk:Mass General Brigham

academic health center

a recent report by the AAMC refers to PHC as a leading academic health center, https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/january2015/422194/health-system.html - link to [ [ Academic health science centre ] ] may be justified Velocipedus (talk) 01:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Write English

Typical Wikipedia. The History section, sentence one, no less, slams us w. an entity called Partners which you haven't defined. Sure, you do that farther on. But define it first, then invoke references thereto. And you wonder why this article has a 'C' rating.

Jimlue (talk) 02:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Incorrect claims in History section

The 3rd paragraph of the history section claims that MGB was 'one of the first health care systems in the nation to launch an electronic health record (EHR) system'. This is objectively false.

By 2015 Epic Systems (who actually developed/launched the system MGB is using) already had hundreds of US health care systems as customers. Kaiser Permanente (a significantly larger health care system) went live with their EHR system in 1994, a full 11 years earlier.

This paragraph should be removed from the article, as it is not notable history. 2620:72:0:111B:7CED:9853:9BE2:D4A7 (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

From The Free Press: "Last Tuesday (April 2nd), Mass General Brigham announced it will stop reporting to child welfare officials suspected incidents of abuse or neglect solely because a fetus or a newborn is exposed to drugs."

https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/en/about/newsroom/press-releases/updating-system-policies-perinatal-testing Il Qathar (talk) 11:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Marketing bias

This article appears to read like a marketing pitch for MGB. Subjective terms like "world leaders" are used as if they are objective facts. 47.176.60.147 (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)