 | Mark Zuckerberg is currently a Engineering and technology good article nominee. Nominated by MSincccc (talk) at 08:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: American businessman and philanthropist (born 1984) |
 | Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account. |
 | READ BEFORE POSTING:
|
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about Mark Zuckerberg. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Mark Zuckerberg at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark Zuckerberg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times to make it onto the all-time Top 100 list. It has had 77 million views since December 2007. |
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2011. |
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Net worth conflicting information
The main article says he has a net worth of $111 billion. The box on the side (sorry, I know you all have a wonderful name for it, but I don't know what it is) says he has a net worth of $99.6 billion and both give "September 2020" as the date for the estimate. Which is it? 82.15.132.29 (talk)
MSincccc I did not want to start the GA review yet but I have some comments for improvement. Currently his net worth is quoted for a given day, I think that is good. However, he is listed behind several others. This list changes often and it is not particularity notable that the list had those members in that order on that day. I would remove the list and just leave it at "the fourth".
Arie Hasit's incorrect claim
Arie Hasit claims Zuckerberg's "FaceMash" put pictures of two males OR two females next to each other, but Zuckerberg said UNDER OATH during questioning that it was in fact "girls" whose pictures were being used this way.
FWD.us Ads
This sentence "in protest of Zuckerberg ads funded by FWD.us" does not make sense in context. What is a Zukerberg ad? The reader, myself included, has no idea. Maybe they are ads supporting Zuckerberg? Or written by him? Czarking0 (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Politics Proseline
The Politics section of the article is WP:Proseline I recommend creating subsections around the topics of note and expanding upon them. Czarking0 (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Recent political revelations
This is worth an update
https://www.wsj.com/tech/mark-zuckerberg-neutral-politics-letter-election-2024-02b86372
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-27/meta-ceo-says-he-was-pressured-by-biden-to-pull-covid-content Helpingtoclarify (talk) 05:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Zuckerberg's revelations
[1] (The Guardian), [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], etc.; there are many reliable sources about this, e.g. The Guardian. JacktheBrown (talk) 18:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mark Zuckerberg/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 08:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: FeydHuxtable (talk · contribs) 09:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks reviewer! If you could give some attention to my Talk page comments as well I would appreciate that. Czarking0 (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also I think you should double check if MSinccc is eligible for the nom under "significant contributor" Czarking0 (talk) 15:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am. I had even posted on the article's talk page long ago having also pinged the significant contributors. I would like to assist in the article's promotion having been familiar with its contents. Looking forward to your response @FeydHuxtable and @Czarking0. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, as one of the top 10 contributors you're defo eligible to put this up for nomination. I'm expecting to engage more substantially with the review, including with Czarking0's useful comments, starting this weekend. FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am. I had even posted on the article's talk page long ago having also pinged the significant contributors. I would like to assist in the article's promotion having been familiar with its contents. Looking forward to your response @FeydHuxtable and @Czarking0. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Preliminary review
Looks great from an initial skim. Per Zuck's status as a tech titan, I plan to take some time on source-text integrity verification. And on reviewing the coverage of Zuck more broadly to confirm the article is NPOV. So it might take a little longer than the standard week before we wrap this up. FeydHuxtable (talk) 09:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Additional Comments
Not the main reviewer but I have some concerned about the quality that I want to ensure are addressed before GA status.
- I think FN9 letsintern is questionable for WP:RS
- I think FN10 Child prodigy is perm dead?