Talk:Mark Helprin
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem
editThis article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mark Helprin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613073737/http://claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1721/article_detail.asp to http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1721/article_detail.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050204080142/http://www.claremont.org/about/staff/helprin.html to http://www.claremont.org/about/staff/helprin.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608174053/http://radio.nationalreview.com/betweenthecovers/post/?q=MjljM2Q2NGY1YjUwZTlmMzRjMmI3YjQzZjZlMjFiN2E%3D to http://radio.nationalreview.com/betweenthecovers/post/?q=MjljM2Q2NGY1YjUwZTlmMzRjMmI3YjQzZjZlMjFiN2E%3D
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
China statement in controversy section
edit"In May 2010, Helprin wrote an article which stated that China's military is "on the cusp" of being able to dominate Taiwan and the rest of the Far East." If this is going to be in the controversy section, there should be something to indicate that it was a controversial statement. I mean, it's a thing people have different estimations about, but you could say that about almost any perspective on anything. Benevolent Prawn (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)