Talk:Marianne Moore

Latest comment: 14 days ago by Potholehotline in topic two changes

Undue weight

edit

I would like to suggest that the section titled "Edsel consulting" is an example of undue weight, and should be either greatly shortened or eliminated. This was an extremely minor event in Moore's career, and it's already covered in the Edsel article, where it seems more appropriate. Unless I get objections here, I will shorten it to one sentence, with a link to Edsel for those curious about the whole story. Chick Bowen 05:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have now done this, since there were no objections. Chick Bowen 05:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merger with The Paper Nautilus

edit

I oppose the merger proposed 2008-04-08. Moore's article would then be dominated by the discussion of a single poem, out of context with the massive whole of her poetic career. Easchiff(talk) 01:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why them??!?

edit

Philadelphia?? St. Louis?GcT (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marianne Moore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

two changes

edit

i found two things i'd like to change in the 'Early life' section, but knowing how british editors can be sensitive about their language (the insular minority dialect) i thought it proper to post this first. in the second paragraph it states that her mother taught in a 'girls school'. in the u.s. form of the language (gringlish) that would be 'girls' school', with a possessive apostrophe, and in the third paragraph it states that she 'was graduated' from bryn mawr. in gringlish the active form is used, i.e. 'she graduated'. moore was a u.s. poet and hence i think perhaps the article should reflect her language, something very dear to a poet. i'll check back here in a few days and if there are no objections will make the above mentioned changes Potholehotline (talk) 17:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think your sense of U.S. usage (what you call "gringlish") is somewhat narrow. I have no particular opinion on the "girls school" matter, but "She was graduated" is perfectly good U.S. usage and may in fact have been preferred in the nineteen-oughts whan Moore was a collegian. See this Merriam-Webster usage note on the question. Deor (talk) 17:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Deor cool, as a contemporary gringlish speaker i can tell you most any of us find 'was graduated' inordinately fey, i know i've never heard it used, and i figured wikipedia represents contemporary use. glad you had no objection to 'girls' school' Potholehotline (talk) 00:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply