This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Margaret of Beverley is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The writers of this page go to great lengths to pretend that women warriors were a normal, but suppressed thing in history, and to deny or cast doubt on the historical claims that, for example, Margaret wore a pot as a helmet, carried water and the rest, solely on that basis. All historical record and literature contradict that modern elitest assumption. Women were not warriors as a rule, and became such only under desperate circumstances, because they simply did not have the size, strength, or physical build of men in physical combat. It is obviously to Margaret’s great credit that she did what she did, and the pretense that women warriors were a normal thing belittles her greatness in rising up to something she wasn’t fit for by her ontological status. 62.4.56.233 (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
