Talk:Marci Hamilton
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Separation of church and state
editIt seems to me that this statement may be her viewpoint, but does not conform to WP:NPOV.
She is an expert on and advocate for the U.S. Constitution's required separation of church and state.--DThomsen8 (talk) 02:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Agreed, whether the constitution requires the separation of church and state is sometimes supported, sometimes undercut by the Supreme Court. More importantly, it isn't an explicit requirement as in some continental systems. So the requirement has no place being asserted in Wikipedia's voice. I am changing the sentence to refer to the establishment clause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.81.114.70 (talk) 02:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Neutrality
editThe section detailing Doug Laycock's opinion on God vs. the Gavel has no place in this article. Many other reviews have praised the book, and his opinion did not cause controversy or anything noteworthy. He also has a known bias against Hamilton after he lost to her at the Supreme Court. Laycock probably added that section himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.89.183 (talk) 21:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
What does this mean ...?
editMaybe I'm dense but what does it mean to be "a widely regarded scholar" in anything? The only definitions of "regarded" which would make sense here are those which are obsolete/archaic. I get the feeling an attempt to make Marci Hamilton look good without actually doing so may be underway here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.69.100 (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marci Hamilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403085915/http://www.andersoncooper.com/2011/11/14/what-laws-need-to-change-to-protect-victims-of-child-abuse/ to http://www.andersoncooper.com/2011/11/14/what-laws-need-to-change-to-protect-victims-of-child-abuse/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)