This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mapillary article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mapillary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402134343/http://www.arcticstartup.com/2013/12/11/jan-erik-solem-launches-mapilary-putting-images-on-the-map to http://www.arcticstartup.com/2013/12/11/jan-erik-solem-launches-mapilary-putting-images-on-the-map
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
License section needs clarifying
editIt looks like the License section was written when Mapillary was NC licensed, and although that detail has been updated to reflect the change of license, the section needs rewriting for clarity. If anyone knows more about Mapillary and has references for its reasons for adopting and then changing its license, please dive in. Otherwise I'll try to come back and fix it after I've done some reading and found some suitable references. --Danylstrype (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Edit requests
editThe following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
For clarity: Please remove “Initial release April 2014; 4 years ago” and replace with “Founded September 2013”, source: https://www.mapillary.com/press
For neutrality: In Research/datasets - Please remove “touted” and replace with “described”
For neutrality: In License - Please remove “The application itself, however, is proprietary, unlike the similar service OpenStreetCam. Mapillary eventually plans to generate revenue by licensing the data its users generate to companies.” This language appears to endorse a competing brand. Suggested replacement: “Commercial licenses are available, in addition to the CC-BY-SA license, for organizations looking to use the images and derived metadata.” source: https://help.mapillary.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001770409-Licenses
Roamingbuffalonian (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Reply 06-SEP-2018
edit- Additional changes made The Mapillary blog section was removed, as it does not directly pertain to the service (rather, it is a place to discuss the service). A link to the Blog was placed in the External links section. spintendo 00:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Statistics Update
editWhen I get a 404 page for mapillary, the statistic "1437.8 million images and you missed them all" pops up. Would count as a verifiable source? (404 page eg here: https://www.mapillary.com/project/verification/) --IanVG (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)