Talk:Map of the Soul: 7

Tracklist

Is anyone going to put the tracklist on this article? The tracklist was revealed today.--2601:194:480:C790:4524:12C6:5987:5F7F (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Other data (writer, composer, producer) are still unavailable for the entire list to be included in the article. —Nairb.Idi9 (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

• "We Are Bulletproof: The Eternal" was also co-written by DJ Swivel (his tweet), but that's all we know so far at this moment. --2A02:810B:4040:3618:81F3:786C:12B3:F5DA (talk) 21:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Personnel section

DanielleTH Alexanderlee : Can a Personnel section be added to this article? Can the credits in AllMusic page here be used for this? Thanks. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ashleyyoursmile: I'd advise against using AllMusic if possible, since that database is also user contributed. It's usually best to use the actual credits booklet found in the album, and often times people upload that online. I can probably write one up later today. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 17:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@DanielleTH: That would be much appreciated. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 17:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

If you are interested, on the it.wiki album page I have already added the personnel section, with track-by-track credits from the booklet. It only needs to be re-translated to English. --Chiya^ko92 18:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

I'm working on it in my sandbox; I'm currently arranging the list by alphabetical order. Feel free to contribute. --Chiya^ko92 10:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

@Chiyako92: Looks great! if there's any part you haven't gotten to yet I wouldn't mind finishing it up for you! Thank you for doing that up, it looks like it took a while. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)}

 Done There are 60 credits per column, but according to one's screen resolution the second one may look longer. --Chiya^ko92 09:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

@Chiyako92: Looks amazing. Thank you so much. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 11:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Tour

Should the article cover the 'Map of the Soul ON:E' concert and exhibition happening online on October 10th and 11th? We don't know the performance setlist yet, but it is a continuation of the Map of the Soul series. Should we wait until after the concert has happened or should we update the article now? — Aerimars (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Sound samples

I am thinking if 2 sound samples could be added to the "Music and lyrics" section to make the readers understand the nuances about the tracks on the album. I have seen several album articles (Folklore and Future Nostalgia, among others of course) that have audio samples and would like to add them here as well. I'm a bit wary of choosing the tracks and would welcome any suggestions in this regard. --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Map of the Soul: 7/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

I made the necessary changes as suggested.

I couldn't find other reliable references for 137 and 138, as they are the original sources. kitb (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Initial comments: looks like a very well written article that the author(s) clearly have spent a lot of time on

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   A few of the sources brought back high scores on the copyvio detector, but it was quotes from the band

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

   Talks about each of the 20 songs, but keeps it clear, concise, and makes a point

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I am going to leave any comments about stuff needing fixing below:

• Lead, 2nd para, 1st sentence: it explains who they worked with but it didn't explain what they did together
• Lead, 4th para, last sentence: could you add that they announced the tour in support/promotion/to promote of the album
• Background: source needed for the picture
• Music and lyrics, 1st para: wikilink human psychology
• Music and lyrics, 2nd para: be consistent with putting the sources after the genre/idea or at the end of the sentence
• Songs: in this section on was stylized as "ON" where in the lead it is stylized as "On", same issue in release in promotion section
• Tour: According to the tour article, it was set to begin on April 11 in Seoul instead of the 25th in santa clara
• Track listing: source(s)
• Personnel: source(s)
• Sources 137, 138, 58, 68 should be replaced as they aren't reliable

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.