Talk:Manuel Elkin Patarroyo

Untitled

Please check the recent edit by 24.69.255.205 otherwise associated with a furtive vandal. Is this edit legit? --Wetman 01:34, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Needs fact check

Needs to be fact checked. No sources for claims of ineffectiveness, hoax, or fraud.--FloNight 01:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

I agree. In Latin America and Tanzania, the vaccine had decent results, although the results were mixed elsewhere. I agree that we should cite sources on the good and bad aspects of his research. Mr. Know-It-All 02:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

I think that it is important to confirm (include links to official sources) that he received a PhD degree from Rockefeller University. An international scientific journal states that he did postdoctoral studies at Rockefeller University, which is quite different. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ar700120t — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.80.73.246 (talk) 23:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

---

I have to disagree regarding your comment about lack of effectiveness in Africa. A comprehensive Cochrane review was published in 2009, with the conclusion that Spf99 is not recommended for prophylaxis of malaria (see http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/userfiles/ccoch/file/CD005966.pdf). It may be useful to include this reference. However, I do not believe at all that his research is fraudulent and he has not shown any interest for profit. The "claims" described in the wikipedia article refer to the fact some individuals believed his institute of immunology at Hospital San Juan de Dios was the causative of this hospital's closure. However, it has been proven many other factors played a crucial role, including but not limited to poor administration oversight, overinflated benefits for employees and lack of budgetary/financial analysis in a charity private/public mixed hospital. He has published in many high impact factor journals (see pubmed and google scholar). Also, his many years of research have been fruitful in developing a system for synthetic vaccines, which has recently been published in the Chemical Reviews journal (cited in the wikipedia article itself). -Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, M.D.

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.24.178.219 (talk) 22:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

• FWIW: the Scientific American ref I added discusses a Lancet study reporting failure of SPf66 in a study of children in Thailand. Agricola44 (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Manuel Elkin Patarroyo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513173118/http://www.fundacionprincipedeasturias.org/esp/04/premiados/trayectorias/trayectoria215.html to http://www.fundacionprincipedeasturias.org/esp/04/premiados/trayectorias/trayectoria215.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720142040/http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/userfiles/ccoch/file/CD005966.pdf to http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/userfiles/ccoch/file/CD005966.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051123082527/http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/article.print?id=4697 to http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/article.print?id=4697

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)