Talk:Manchester, Connecticut

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Connecticut High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Britannica error?

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the process of trying to evaluate this Wikipedia edit, I think I may have found a potential error in the Britannica article on Manchester, CT. It states that the area was settled in 1672 when it was purchased by Thomas Hooker. However, Thomas Hooker seems to have died in 1647. This alternative source (which is a subpage of a site cited in the Wikipedia article on Manchester, CT) seems to give a more reasonable account, suggesting that it was settled from the area that had previously been founded (perhaps purchased?) by Hooker. Minor note: The page also suggests a settlement date of "around 1673" which differs slightly from the 1672 date that appears elsewhere (e.g. [1]). After a quick Internet search, I could not find any reference to a son named Thomas Hooker that the Britannica article might have been referring to (see, for example, here and here (which, incidently, reports a significantly different birth year for Hooker than other sources)). Can anyone confirm my suspicion that the Britannica account is in error? I may add this to Wikipedia:Errors in the Encyclopædia Britannica that have been corrected in Wikipedia or simply repost this message on the talk page there.--GregRM 02:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Town History

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article mentions nothing about Manchester's history as Orford Parish before it was incorporated as a town. Anybody have a pamplet on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.215.226.192 (talk) 05:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Board of directors

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is last sessions lineup. The current lineup of Manchester's Board of Directors is:

Mayor, Louis A. Spadaccini (R)
Deputy Mayor, Leo V. Diana (D)
Secretary, Lisa P. O'Neill (D)
Rudy Kissman (D)
Jay Moran (D)
Kevin Zingler (D)
Chari Ann Pelliteir (R)
Mark Tweedie (R)
Dennis Brenner (R)

Michael Farina was defated in the 2009 election, Jeff Beckmen was defeated in 2009 by Leo diana and Matt Peak has resigned. The election is coming up next month and Zingler and Mayor Spaddacini will not be running. These are the Boad of directors members, and I will write back after the election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Politicion (talk • contribs) 03:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Here again, Ok the current Manchester Board of directors reads as follows

Mayor Leo V. Diana (D)
Deputy Mayor Jay Moran (D)
Secretary Lisa P. O'Neill (D)
Rudy Kissman (D)
Steve Gates (D)
John Topping (D)
Minority Leader Chari Ann Pelletier (R)
Mark Tweedie (R)
Susan Holmes (R)

The General Manager is still Scott Shanley (D). Please put this down! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.251.56.5 (talk) 13:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manchester, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304050323/http://www.sots.ct.gov/sots/lib/sots/electionservices/registration_and_enrollment_stats/nov15re.pdf to http://www.sots.ct.gov/sots/lib/sots/electionservices/registration_and_enrollment_stats/nov15re.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Manchester, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic