This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Woo-hoo!!!! It's saved! Now my question is this: How long or fleshed-out this article has to be to drop the "stub" classification? I've seen short articles classified as stubs, including one-sentence "stubs," but this is the longest stub I've ever seen. (...and that's not meant to be innuendo.) Nhprman 16:06, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
<Sigh> This importance of this phrase was established in Jan. Tfd, which it survived (see above). There is no need to tag this article. An "importance" tag seems inappropriate, and overkill frankly, for a simple portmanteau, or an attempt to re-start a deletion process that is also inappropriate. Nhprman 02:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)