Talk:Manasser Biset

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ealdgyth in topic GA Review

Source...

edit
-- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, this doesn't actually have anything useful for Manasser ... interesting though. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Manasser Biset/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 01:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'll have a look at this. Gog the Mild (talk) 01:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

That's all I have. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

    • Hope it wasn't too much of a strain! He's not got a lot but he's a link in various bits of history - and important in his own right as a pretty influential justice. It's just the period is sparse for documentation. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ha! It was very soothing. I often feel I have problems, but you seem to be making bricks without either mud or straw.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed