Talk:Magnetization roasting technology
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overall Evaluation
editThis Wikipedia article provides a detailed overview of magnetization roasting technology, including its classifications, specific processes, advantages and disadvantages, and theoretical basis. The structure is clear, the content is comprehensive, and it cites numerous sources. However, there are areas for improvement to enhance readability and accuracy. SDDEZHOUZYC (talk) 12:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Review 2
editThis article is a good introduction to the magnetization roasting technology and its classification, in the classification for the vertical furnace magnetic roasting, rotary kiln magnetic roasting, fluidized bed magnetization roasting as well as microwave magnetic roasting have a more systematic introduction. The theoretical basis and technical evaluation are also more specific, but many professional terms in the article need to add references so that readers can more quickly access to related knowledge, such as hematite, weakly magnetic iron minerals, and so on. JEREMY1117 (talk) 13:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Review 3
editSimplify and Refine Language Redundant Sections: Some paragraphs contain redundant descriptions, such as the repeated description in the "Rotary Kiln Magnetic Roasting" section. These should be removed to streamline the content. Technical Terminology Explanation: Include brief explanations for technical terms to make the article accessible to non-expert readers. Terms like "magnetization roasting" and "reducing gases" could benefit from brief clarifications. Haotiandd (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This page needs a major rewrite to meet the standards of Wikipedia articles. Too many sections, too much peacock, many sentences and paragraphs that fail to provide useful information.
Ldm1954 (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Rewritten article is way better, good job. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Observations and suggestions for improvements
editThe following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2024.
A translation of chinese scripts in the images would improve the quality of the article