Talk:Magnetic tape/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Magnetic tape. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Image:Magnetic tape.jpg has been listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Magnetic tape.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 15:55, 15 December 2005. |
6250 bpi, 3200 bpi
Anyone have information on the recording techniques used for 6250 bpi and 3200 bpi 9-track tapes? The 3200 format is described as "Double Phase Encoding"; I think it may be the same as 1600 only denser (as some tape drives can do 3200 bpi) but I'm not sure. The 6250 format is called GCR, but in this case that's an error-correction code. I'd like to know what the actual recording technique was (NRZi, maybe?). One reference states that a 6250 bpi tape had over 9000 flux transitions per inch, but the numbers don't add up for either PE or NRZi (6250 * 8/7 = 7142 takes the error correction code into account if it's NRZi). There's an ANSI standard (X3.54) but I'm too cheap to buy it for curiosity's sake. Nybbler 20:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind... found it. It's RLL(0,2), which is a rate 5/4 code. And 4 synchronization codes are inserted every 316 data codes, which gives 6250 * 8/7 * 5/4 * 320/316 = (approx) 9042. Nybbler 15:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Removing Link
I am looking for information about the process of magnetic recording. What I get when I click on this link (at "Guitarz-for-ever"), besides advertisement links, direct product links, and links for "Eddie Van Halen" and "Motivation to Acheive Success", is seven basic paragraphs on the evolution of recording. If there is any appropriate information, i.e. information concerning the subject of this encyclopedia article, it is not directly accessible. Renfield 16:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Video recording: "Live" time-shifting
An IP editor inserted the following after the article's mention of "live" time-shifting possible with digital video recording:
(? What does this mean? VCRs can time shift on-the-fly, so it can't mean that. Is it referring to play-while-record?)
Yes, it is. As I noted in the edit summary, "instant replay" was an early example: Play back an earlier portion of the recording while continuing to record live. Perhaps a better word or term can be found here than "live time-shifting". And I might as well also mention that "instant replay" isn't really the best example, either, because that was first done with an analog video disc recorder such as an Ampex HS-100. Jeh (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
BTW, to the IP editor: Please don't insert questions in the visible text in the article. Embedded comments ( <!-- --> ) will get the attention of anyone watching the article but won't bother readers. Or, you can use the article talk page. Thanks! Jeh (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Article needs to include more information on the many materials used for the tape itself, and specially for the magnetic coating; as well as information on the protective coatings, information on the deterioration mechanisms and more on the aging of tapes. Common tape widths and lenghts are not included. Audio "Print-through" is not mentioned also. As it is now, the page is very incomplete. amclaussen.
- There should also be mention of capacities that have been recently achieved - LTO-3, 800GB compressed. -Tapeman (16:24, 17 March 2005)
- This (info about materials and their deterioration) is what I hoped to find in this article. Hopefully at least some of this is included in the articles about specific formats. 165.225.38.83 (talk) 16:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Uncited material in need of citations
I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CS, WP:NOR, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- I have reverted this and have started addressing tags previously added by Nightscream. Additional context on this editing pattern can be found at Talk:Radio#Uncited_material_in_need_of_citations and User_talk:Nightscream#Tagging_uncited_material. ~Kvng (talk) 16:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|