This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Explaining Recent Edits

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A couple content related issues arose while cleaning up grammar/style:

While the article claims that MTV Indonesia was the first free-to-air 24 hours a day programming, the WSJ article reports an MTV Southeast Asia saying they had done the same thing in the Phillipines before moving into Indonesia.

Aside from the missing cites, details of the channel 2007 and 2015 need clarification. E.g., article says that GTV acquired MTV Indonesia but then says it licensed it, and then later says that it "didn't renew the contract", which would normally mean it never acquired the rights (only leased or "rented" them). Normally I would look to the source content, but I couldn't find details of these transactions in any of the sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icemonstersoccer (talk • contribs) 11:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

=Notes

Removed the list again November 2010 - can see no reason why such lists exist inside article - Satu Suro 11:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A question for any editors who add to the list - does the WP In project allow such lists? please show examples

Until 2007:

Guest VJs

Former VJs

Programme

Past programmes

added to talk rather than article by Satu Suro 06:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply