Talk:MAP45 Armoured Personnel Carrier
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Tony1 in topic Requested move 13 November 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 13 November 2024
edit
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
- MAP45 Armoured Personnel Carrier → MAP45 armoured personnel carrier
- MAP75 Armoured Personnel Carrier → MAP75 armoured personnel carrier
- Crocodile Armoured Personnel Carrier → Crocodile armoured personnel carrier
– Here "armoured personnel carrier" is generic, the type, while the first part is the proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 06:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as usual, per WP:MILCAPS, MOS:CAPS, and WP:LOWERCASE styling guidelines and many precedents. For the first two, RMs resulting in titles of the form "ModelNumber descriptive phrase" with lowercasing of the descriptive part include Talk:T1 light tank (9 articles), Talk:M6 heavy tank (7 articles), Talk:A7 medium tank (4 articles), Talk:M1918 Ford 3-ton tank (1 article), Talk:M1 armored car (3 articles), Talk:M1126 infantry carrier vehicle (10 articles), Talk:M6 bomb service truck (1 article), Talk:M1918 Browning automatic rifle (1 article), Talk:M728 combat engineer vehicle (1 article), Talk:M3 scout car (1 article), Talk:M21 mortar carrier (1 article), Talk:M1117 armored security vehicle (1 article). As for the Crocodile, it seems conceptually similar to the Python (and the Harrier, the King, the Humber, etc.). — BarrelProof (talk) 18:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support—WP has no business replicating companies' boosterism. Tony (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2024 (UTC)