Talk:Lynn Snodgrass
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Peteforsyth in topic removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lynn Snodgrass article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NPOV template
editI didn't add the {{NPOV}} template (User:PeteForsyth did); here's what he said in his editsummary when adding it:
- "add NPOV tag (Thus far, this is only based on a single WW article, written from a decidedly Portland-centric perspective."
I was reviewing it, since there was no discussion here. I'll echo Pete's comment, the article isn't terribly neutral, nor is the tone very cohesive. Finally, it uses the word "She" a bit too much. tedder (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- In this unusual case, I think it's better to leave the banner on. I wrote the bulk of this article, and also added the banner; the reason is that the only thorough and reliable source I could find contained significant bias. This is not unusual when working on the bio of a local politician. While it would be possible to more thoroughly research this article and improve it, it's going to take substantial work to do so, and I don't have any immediate plans to take it on. -Pete (talk) 14:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)