Talk:Long-acting reversible contraceptives
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'd like to propose an edit to this page. There has been a lot of recent research in the area of LARC in the last couple years. I work with the authors of a lot of those articles and would like to update this page. Currently I'm in the process of having a physician review my edits for accuracy. Overall I would like to improve the quality of this page, because I know that it is considered of lower quality. SarahRose12 34 (talk) 18:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Long-acting reversible contraception. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502063334/http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Gynecologic_Practice/Increasing_Use_of_Contraceptive_Implants_and_Intrauterine_Devices_To_Reduce_Unintended_Pregnancy to http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Gynecologic_Practice/Increasing_Use_of_Contraceptive_Implants_and_Intrauterine_Devices_To_Reduce_Unintended_Pregnancy
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502063334/http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Gynecologic_Practice/Increasing_Use_of_Contraceptive_Implants_and_Intrauterine_Devices_To_Reduce_Unintended_Pregnancy to http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Committee_on_Gynecologic_Practice/Increasing_Use_of_Contraceptive_Implants_and_Intrauterine_Devices_To_Reduce_Unintended_Pregnancy
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Long-acting reversible contraception. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090920091647/http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg030quickrefguide.pdf to http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg030quickrefguide.pdf
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120709202834/http://cks.library.nhs.uk/contraception/management/goals_and_outcome_measures/qof_indicators to http://cks.library.nhs.uk/contraception/management/goals_and_outcome_measures/qof_indicators
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Contraceptive injection - LARC?
editI propose we remove the injection from the list of LARCs. The typical use efficacy of the injection is more similar to oral contraceptives than it is to the other LARC methods. It also diverges from the other methods in terms of how long it lasts (months vs years). I'm open to other opinions though. DocMuffin (talk) 02:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
April 2024--Making updates!
editHello fellow LARC talk page folks! I came across this article and feel like it could use some updates. Here are the updates I propose:
1) remove contraceptive injections, as most leading medical groups do not consider injections to be LARCs.
2) Update older information, particularly older references. A lot of research has been done about LARCS in the last ten years, especially on the social and cultural meanings of the devices.
3) Fill out table
4)Medical use section: add information on other effects of LARCs, such as menstrual regulation, cramping relief, and as emergency contraception
5) Update the side effects section to be more well-rounded; side effects can be intense with LARCs and this section seems rather brief.
6) Cost and benefit: add citations
7) Promotion: update citations
8) I would like to add another section that includes information about LARC "controversies" (for lack of a better term.) A lot of research has documented patients feeling pressured to choose LARCs, especially after the promotion campaigns documented in the Promotion section. I would like to include information about the drive toward patient-centered contraceptive care the has evolved from this.
If anyone has qualms with these plans, wants to make suggestions, or would like to also work to update this page, please be in touch! Annabelle francesca olb (talk) 01:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)