Talk:London Central

File:Bus route 63.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:Bus route 63.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:London central logo.png has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Book reference out of date

The route contracts are changing regularly due to a 5-7 year contract length with different routes up for tender every year. Why is a book from 2015 an acceptable reference but http://thetflbusesblog.blogspot.co.uk/p/tendering-results.html is considered unacceptable? LondonBusPilot (talk) 11:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

LondonBusPilot, read our guidelines on notability. A source needs to be reliable, the blog that you mentioned fails our criteria on being original research. Nightfury 08:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)