Talk:Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Israeli procurement
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Hcobb in topic Institute for National Security Studies
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Israeli procurement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement was copied or moved into Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Israeli procurement with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Needs structure
editAt the moment mostly a sequence of "X said Y" culled from media. GraemeLeggett (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- At least some sectioning! - Ahunt (talk) 15:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Curiously, breaking down the announcements by year just makes the whole edifice look even more rickety. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I think it is an improvement! - Ahunt (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Why?
editWhy is this a separate article and not just a paragraph in theprocurement article, which is all that is justified. Can someone give me a reason for not prodding or mergeing it?Petebutt (talk) 21:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Because it's out of the way here and can be carefully groomed until it actually resembles a half-decent piece of text rather than cluttering up the main article? GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- The article is already pretty large and with a controversial aircraft like this will only get larger over time. We already had consensus to split! - Ahunt (talk) 00:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Institute for National Security Studies
edithttp://www.defpro.com/daily/details/958/?SID=979cfc441af241d03ffd58dcacb34cfa
This one paper is getting pasted all over the place, but I didn't see anything notable enough to add. Hcobb (talk) 17:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)