Talk:Ljung–Box test
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 206.47.94.139 in topic Ambiguity in open paragraph re. Box-Pierce vs. Ljung–Box
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Portmanteau test
editshould be merged with the article portmanteau test, they are almost identical. Xzar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.177.146.182 (talk) 18:38, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- There is at least one other "portmanteau test", which I have now included in that article. But I have removed the duplication of the material that is best placed in this article. Melcombe (talk) 16:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Ambiguity in open paragraph re. Box-Pierce vs. Ljung–Box
edit"The Box-Pierce test statistic is a simplified version of the Ljung–Box statistic for which subsequent simulation studies have shown poor performance.". Which of the two test has shown poor performance? It's not clear from this sentence due to its ambiguous reference. 206.47.94.139 (talk) 04:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)